ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
High-throughput and Efficient Assay for Central Nervous System Infection with Targeted Nanopore Sequencing Technology.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) infections represent a significant global public health concern and are characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates. In this study, we developed an integrated diagnostic approach for CNS infections by combining high-throughput nanopore sequencing with multiplex PCR amplification, designated targeted nanopore sequencing (tNPS). Methods: The tNPS assay employed a dual detection strategy incorporating pathogen-specific primers targeting 17 prevalent CNS pathogens (seven bacteria, one fungus and nine DNA viruses), with universal primers for the comprehensive amplification of full-length 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. Results: Analytical validation of tNPS was successfully carried out using the 12 positive reference strains (seven bacteria, one fungus, and four DNA viruses) individually, the ZymoBIOMICS microbial community (eight bacteria and two fungi), the laboratory synthetic community of bacteria and fungi (seven bacteria and one fungus), and the laboratory synthetic community of viruses (five DNA viruses). With accelerated turnaround time within 8 h, the tNPS also assayed 11 clinical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples, which further confirmed the feasibility of precise identification of CNS pathogens compared to CSF culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Discussion: Our tNPS as a culture-independent diagnostic assay offered enhanced efficiency, high-throughput capability, and an expanded pathogen detection spectrum, facilitating potential implementation in molecular diagnosis of CNS infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.