ArticleBioinformation2025
Comparison of bond strength for light-cure tray to addition silicone impression material after three surface treatments: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of various surface modifications-specifically, sandblasting with aluminium oxide, sanding with 80-grit sandpaper and grooving with an inverted cone bur-on the tensile bond strength between universal tray adhesive and light-cure tray material utilising VPS impression material is of interest. Eighty specimens were fabricated with visible light polymerizing acrylic resin (Profibase) and divided into four groups (n = 20). Group A served as the control (no modification), while Groups B, C and D underwent sandblasting, sandpapering and bur grooving, respectively. The mean tensile bond strength among the groups had a significant difference, with Group C exhibiting the highest strength at 16.75 ± 1.83 MPa, followed by Group B at 9.30 ± 1.35 MPa, Group D at 8.33 ± 1.18 MPa and Group A at 5.60 ± 0.60 MPa, after a one-way ANOVA test was applied. Among the surface treatments, sandpapering with 80-grit sandpaper significantly enhanced the bond strength, while the control group showed the lowest adhesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.