Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170067›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Decoding CBME through a longitudinal faculty development program: A comparative study.

Sudhanshu Agrawal, Rupa Singh, Abhinav Singh, Ashish Goel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sudhanshu AgrawalDepartment of Physiology, Mahatma Vidur Autonomous State Medical College, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rupa SinghDepartment of Physiology, Mahatma Vidur Autonomous State Medical College, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abhinav SinghDepartment of Physiology, Mahatma Vidur Autonomous State Medical College, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ashish GoelDepartment of Physiology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National Medical Commission (NMC) conducts two-day CISP workshop under Faculty Development Programs (FDP) for CBME but short duration may not be enough for proper faculty improvement. In our study, 62 faculty (CISP trained and non-trained) underwent longitudinal FDP with CBME modules for three months with weekly sessions, pre-post tests and feedback were taken. Initially trained faculty performed better but with repeated sessions, non-trained also improved and both groups showed similar post-test results and feedback trend. So, CISP should be done as longitudinal program to save time and manpower and to improve CBME understanding in faculty.

Indexed as

CISPcompetency-based medical education (CBME)Faculty Development Programs (FDP)feedbacklongitudinalpost- testpre- test

Identifiers

PMID41170067
PMCPMC12569897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.