Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170055›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Picture quality between DSLR cameras and smartphone cameras among prosthodontics postgraduate students.

Varsha Mangtani, Anuja Tripathi, Alka Gupta, Mukesh Soni, Harsh Chansoria, Shivani Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Varsha MangtaniDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Anuja TripathiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Alka GuptaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mukesh SoniDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Harsh ChansoriaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shivani GuptaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The line between smartphone and Digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras is becoming less clear, especially in dental photography. This study assessed the knowledge of prosthodontic postgraduate students regarding image quality from both camera types. Approximately 300 students participated in a questionnaire that covered their knowledge, practices and opinions on DSLR versus smartphone photography. Data were analyzed using simple percentages. The results showed that DSLR cameras are still preferred for dental photography among these students.

Indexed as

dental photographyDigital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camerasimage qualitypost-graduate studentssmartphone cameras

Identifiers

PMID41170055
PMCPMC12569847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.