ArticleCardiology research2025
Discriminative Accuracy of CHA2DS2-VASc Score, and Development of Predictive Accuracy Model Using Machine Learning for Ischemic Stroke Risk in Cardiac Amyloidosis and Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Cardiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, Incidence, and Impact of Cancer in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 70,000,000 Patients.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation - Timely diagnosis, risk assessment and personalized management.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: CHA2DS2-VASc score in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) with atrial fibrillation (AF) is believed to underestimate ischemic stroke risk, necessitating a better predictive model. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Readmission Database (NRD). Outcomes between CA-AF and no-CA-AF were compared using multivariate regression analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs). AutoScore, an interpretable machine learning framework, was used to develop a stroke risk prediction model, and its predictive accuracy was evaluated with an area under the curve (AUC) using the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: A total of 11,860,804 (CA-AF 22,687 (0.19%) and no-CA-AF 11,838,117) patients were identified from 2015 to 2019. The adjusted odds of mortality (aOR: 1.41 and 1.29), stroke (aOR: 1.78 and 1.74), non-intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 2.10 and 1.85), and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 14.4 and 4.26) were significantly higher in CA-AF compared with non-CA-AF at both index admission and 30 days, respectively. The CHA2DS2-VASc score had a poor discriminative accuracy for stroke at 30 days in CA-AF (AUC 49%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 47 - 51, P = 0.54). The machine learning autoscore integrative model revealed excellent predictive ability of our newly proposed E-CHADS score (end-stage renal disease (ESRD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN), cancer, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM)) for 30-day risk of ischemic stroke in CA-AF (cutoff of 52 points random forest score) with an AUC of 80% (95% CI: 74 - 86). Conclusions: CA with AF carries a high risk of ischemic stroke that is not accurately predicted by the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Our proposed model (E-CHADS) identifies three new variables (ESRD, dementia, and cancer) that have higher discriminative accuracy for ischemic stroke in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.