Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169982›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Periprocedural complications after laser balloon ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation: An analysis using a nationwide claims database.

Ken Kawase, Reina Tonegawa-Kuji, Koshiro Kanaoka, Yoko Sumita, Koji Miyamoto, Kengo Kusano, Yoshihiro Miyamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ken KawaseDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Reina Tonegawa-KujiDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Koshiro KanaokaDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoko SumitaDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Koji MiyamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kengo KusanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshihiro MiyamotoOpen Innovation Center, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the periprocedural safety of laser balloon (LB) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is scarce. Objective: We aimed to investigate the periprocedural safety of LB ablation for AF compared with that of either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation using a nationwide claims database. Methods: Patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF between 2018 and 2022 were identified using the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases - Diagnosis Procedure Combination. The outcomes included in-hospital mortality, emergency 30-day readmission, common periprocedural complications, and a composite of complications. Outcomes were compared between the treatment groups in 2 separate propensity score-matched cohort: LB vs radiofrequency groups and LB vs cryoballoon groups. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratios for the outcomes. Results: Overall, 179,207 patients who underwent AF ablation were included. The incidence rate of periprocedural complications after LB ablation was 3.2%, including a 1.6% incidence of stroke. In propensity score-matched cohorts, LB ablation procedures were associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural complications compared with radiofrequency ablation procedures. Furthermore, LB ablation was associated with a higher incidence of stroke or transient ischemic attack than those after cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation. No significant differences were observed in in-hospital deaths, other complications, or emergency readmissions between LB ablation and either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. Conclusion: LB ablation was associated with a higher incidence of stroke compared with either cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation. Most patients experiencing stroke after LB ablation were discharged home.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCryoballoon ablationLaser balloon ablationPeriprocedural safetyRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID41169982
PMCPMC12570194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.