Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169981›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

The efficiency and safety of zero-exchange workflows in pulsed field ablation: Comprehensive insights from the DISRUPT-AF registry.

Robert Eckart, Robert Brewer, Devi Nair, Jonathan Dukes, John Costello, Matthew D Martens, Saja Al-Dujaili, Brad S Sutton, Jose Osorio, Amin Al-Ahmad and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06335082 (A Registry Based Collaborative to Measure Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Safety of Farapulse Pulsed Field Ablation Technology for Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06335082 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

A Registry Based Collaborative to Measure Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Safety of Farapulse Pulsed Field Ablation Technology for Atrial Fibrillation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHeart Rhythm Clinical and Research Solutions, LLCRan2024 to 2028Enrolled10,000ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsPulsed Field Ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of Radiofrequency Transseptal Puncture Devices.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert EckartHCA Florida, Heart Specialists of Sarasota, Sarasota, Florida.
Robert BrewerMercyOne Iowa Heart Center, West Des Moines, Iowa.
Devi NairArrythmia Research Group, St. Bernards Healthcare, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Jonathan DukesCommunity Memorial Hospital, Ventura, California.
John CostelloCardiovascular Associates of the Delaware Valley, The Heart House, Haddon Heights, New Jersey.
Matthew D MartensBoston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Saja Al-DujailiBoston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Brad S SuttonBoston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Jose OsorioHCA Florida Hospitals, Mercy Hospital, Miami, Florida.
Amin Al-AhmadTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, Texas.
DISRUPT-AF Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has revolutionized catheter ablation procedures in terms of safety, efficiency, and efficacy. Streamlined zero-exchange workflows with therapy sheath integrated transseptal puncture (TSP) devices may offer further improvements. However, the impact of device exchanges on real-world PFA procedures remains unknown. Objective: We aimed to describe and quantify procedural characteristics associated with different PFA workflows. Methods: The DISRUPT-AF registry (NCT06335082) is an observational, prospective study assessing clinical experience with the pentaspline PFA system in the United States. Procedures are performed as per standard-of-care, where specific workflows and left atrial (LA) access devices were not mandated. Results: A total of 873 cases (mean age, 68.0 ± 11.4 years; 38.6% women) with 62 unique operators across 20 centers were assessed. Of these, 10.1%, 63.1%, and 26.8% reported "0"-, "1-2"-, and "3+"-exchanges, respectively. Regardless of atrial fibrillation subtype, zero-exchange workflows were associated with significantly shorter and more consistent TSP times (0:5.7 ± 4.2 min; 1-2:15.3 ± 7.3 min; 3+:19.2 ± 9.3 min; Conclusion: The adoption of zero-exchange workflows enabled by therapy sheath-integrated TSP devices results in significant improvements in procedural efficiency and predictability without compromising patient safety or acute outcomes.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCatheter ablationPulsed field ablationTransseptal punctureWorkflowZero-ExchangeZero-Fluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID41169981
PMCPMC12570166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.