ArticleCase reports in dentistry2025
Root Development Following Bioceramic Material Application in Immature Permanent Teeth: A Case Series With 24-Month Follow-Up.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06119477 (Comparison of Three Techniques in Bioceramic Apexification Procedure for Necrotic Immature Incisors), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Three Techniques in Bioceramic Apexification Procedure for Necrotic Immature Incisors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthograde Apical Barrier in Non-Vital Immature Permanent Teeth: A Narrative Review of Clinical Pathways, Procedural Determinants, and Evidence Gaps.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of extended calcium hydroxide medication followed by a bioceramic apical barrier in immature permanent teeth: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Epidemiology Meets Advocacy: Understanding Pediatric Dental Trauma and Delayed Care in Post-Conflict Syria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Dental trauma frequently impacts children and adolescents, leading to functional and esthetic challenges. If not managed promptly and effectively, complications may ensue. Apexification with calcium silicate cement (CSC) has been proposed as a reliable treatment for necrotic immature teeth with thick dentinal walls and open apices. While CSC effectively eliminates periapical infection and improves tooth survival, its ability to promote root lengthening in immature teeth is not consistently proven. Materials and Methods: This case series highlights five instances in four children of traumatized anterior teeth with necrotic pulps treated using bioceramic putty and bioceramic sealer-a contemporary generation of CSC-in apexification procedures spanning two to three visits. Results: Radiographic follow-ups of 24 months demonstrated successful canal system sealing, periapical lesions healing, and notable root lengthening. Importantly, no posttreatment complications, such as pain or exacerbation, were observed, underscoring the efficacy and potential of these materials for managing necrotic immature permanent teeth. Conclusion: Bioceramic apical barrier is recognized as an effective treatment for managing traumatized anterior teeth. Moreover, it demonstrates promising results by facilitating the healing of necrotic immature teeth and potentially supporting root lengthening. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06119477.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.