ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Establishment of reliable identification algorithms for acute heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure using clinical data from a medical information database network.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of algorithms based on electronic health data in identifying cases of acute heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure at multiple institutions using the Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET®) in Japan. Methods: Data were collected from March 8, 2021 to March 31, 2021, from the data source of three hospitals among the MID-NET® cooperating medical institutions. All Possible Cases were defined by combining ICD-10 codes related to acute heart failure and abnormal values of serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Eighteen algorithms were created using various data sources in MID-NET®, including electronic medical records, diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) data, and health insurance claims data. True cases were determined by reviewing medical records obtained independently by two experienced physicians. Results: The kappa coefficient among the three medical institutions was 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.98). Among the 18 algorithms, the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of the three medical institutions was 77.78% for Algorithm 8 which was constructed using ICD-10 codes in DPC disease data, moderate or high range of abnormal BNP (≥100 pg/mL) or NT-proBNP (≥400 pg/mL), and medications for acute heart failure. The highest sensitivity at 89.53% was observed for Algorithm 9. This algorithm was constructed using a combination of disease codes entered in electronic medical records, DPC, or health insurance claims data, abnormal BNP values in the moderate or high range (≥100 pg/mL), and medications for acute heart failure. However, its PPV was the lowest among 18 algorithms, generally reflecting the inverse relationship between PPV and sensitivity. The same tendency was seen in the sensitivity study. Cases with stable chronic heart failure, renal insufficiency, assessment for cardiac function, or severe circulatory failure inflated false-positive cases in this study. Conclusion: Validated algorithms for identifying acute heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure were successfully established. Using these algorithms should facilitate more appropriate pharmacoepidemiological studies related to acute heart failure and contribute to better drug safety assessments based on real-world data in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.