Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169838›Full record

ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

Robotic Surgery in Africa: History, Contemporary, and Thereafter.

Victor Chimezie Okebalama, Olutomiwa Ayoola Omokore, Vanessa Chinonyelum Dike-Isreal, Ifeoluwa Oluwadamilola Asaolu, Hamida Adedolapo Owolabi, Moyinoluwa Joan Idowu, Efetobore Zadok Evwierhoma, Kingdom Jojo Perelade, Hezekiah Olaniran Olabiyi, Nkechi Chima-Ogbuyi and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives for Equity and Capacity Building in Robot-ic Urological Surgery in Africa.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Victor Chimezie OkebalamaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Olutomiwa Ayoola OmokoreDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Vanessa Chinonyelum Dike-IsrealDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Ifeoluwa Oluwadamilola AsaoluDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Hamida Adedolapo OwolabiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Moyinoluwa Joan IdowuDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Efetobore Zadok EvwierhomaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Kingdom Jojo PereladeDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Hezekiah Olaniran OlabiyiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Nkechi Chima-OgbuyiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Rukayat Abiodun OlayemiaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Chibuzo Christian AbaenowaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Ogechi Kosisochukwu AkudinobiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.
Cyprian Ejike OkoronkwoDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Babcock University Teaching Hospital Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since its introduction in the late 1980s, robotic surgery has become a less invasive procedure, offering advantages such as increased dexterity, mobility, 3D visualization, and reduced fatigue for surgeons. Although the procedure is still not widely used in Africa, it is fast growing and can potentially minimize surgical inequities in low- and middle-income nations. This narrative review aims to explore the advantages of robotic surgery, its history in Africa, the current level of application of this surgical technique in the continent, the limitations, and how the healthcare system in the region stands to benefit from its use in the future. Methodology: In this narrative review, extensive literature research was conducted using the Google search engine and databases: 'Google Scholar', 'Cochrane Library', 'PubMed', 'ScienceDirect', and African Journals Online (AJOL), spanning 6 months. The search phrases used included: robotic surgery, robotic surgery in Africa, history of robotic surgery in Africa, robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries, potential advantages of robotic surgery, robotic surgery limitations, benefits of robotic surgery, demerits of robotic surgery, artificial Intelligence in surgical care, and the future of robotic surgery.A total of 405 articles were found. An advanced search that limited the search to titles revealed only 20 results. Two discussed the possibility of embracing robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries, one talked about the potential benefits, challenges, and scope of robotic surgery in the future. Also, one talked about the origin of robotic surgery, one delved into artificial Intelligence and its role in surgical care, then discussed the roles of robotic surgery in surgical care, and the rest discussed the few recorded applications of robotic surgery in surgical care in Africa. Results: Even though the concept of robotics in surgery dates back more than fifty years, its practical application began in the late 1980s. Its enormous potential notwithstanding, the application of robotic surgery on the African continent is still highly underwhelming. Admittedly the utilization of robotic surgery in Africa faces many challenges such as the high cost of its acquisition, maintenance, and training needed to use the machine, the upskilling of surgeons to specialize in robotic surgery in each field of expertise, the need to alter the size and layout of pre-existing operating rooms to accommodate the components of the robots and to also increase patient load for the use of the robot to make it effective for the cost price, it can potentially reduce cost of healthcare, nosocomial infections, antibiotics abuse and surgical inequalities in the Mother Continent. Conclusion: Our research showed that robotic surgery, despite offering multiple benefits and having the capability to lessen surgical inequalities in resource-poor nations, is still underutilized in the African continent. The study also showed that even though the utilization of robotic surgery faces challenges in middle and low-income parts of the world, like Africa, due to high costs, limited facilities, patient burden, and the need for specialized training. It, however, holds enormous potential in the continent, such as reductions of infections, antibiotic resistance, and hospital stays, and even possibly reduce the costs of healthcare.

Indexed as

AdvantagesAfricaBenefitsHistoryLimitationsRobotic Surgery

Identifiers

PMID41169838
PMCPMC12571374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.