Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169767›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025

Comparative evaluation of four different calcium-based medicaments as an indirect pulp capping agent: An

Ray Anuja Awadhesh, Nitin Kararia, Deepak Kumar Sharma, Shyam Agrawal, Rachit Mathur, Jyotirmoyee Bhanja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ray Anuja AwadheshDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Nitin KarariaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Deepak Kumar SharmaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Shyam AgrawalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Rachit MathurDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Jyotirmoyee BhanjaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The choice of material for indirect pulp capping (IPC) may affect long-term pulp vitality, particularly with newer bioactive cements. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of TheraCal LC, Binar LC, calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement, and calcium hydroxide as IPC agents in mature permanent teeth with deep carious lesions. Methods: In this prospective randomized trial, 52 patients with deep caries and reversible pulpitis were divided into four groups ( Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests analyzed pain (Visual Analog Scale scores); Chi-square tests compared categorical variables. Results: All materials maintained pulp vitality without significant differences ( Conclusions: All tested materials were effective IPC agents; however, bioactive materials (CEM cement and TheraCal LC) demonstrated superior clinical outcomes and sealing ability versus traditional calcium hydroxide.

Indexed as

Bioactive materialscalcium-enriched mixture cementcalcium hydroxidecalcium silicate cementsdeep caries managementpulp preservationTheraCal LC

Identifiers

PMID41169767
PMCPMC12571463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.