Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169746›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not alter GABA concentration or functional connectivity in the normal visual cortex.

Dania Abuleil, Diana Gorbet, Daphne L McCulloch, Remy Cohan, Jennifer Evelyn Kate Steeves, Ji Won Bang, Kevin C Chan, Benjamin Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dania AbuleilSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Diana GorbetCentre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daphne L McCullochSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Remy CohanCentre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer Evelyn Kate SteevesCentre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ji Won BangSpencer Center for Vision Research, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Kevin C ChanSpencer Center for Vision Research, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Benjamin ThompsonSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anodal direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) of the visual cortex is a potential rehabilitation tool for vision disorders such as amblyopia and macular degeneration. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are currently unknown. When applied to the human motor cortex, a-tDCS reduces the concentration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an inhibitory neurotransmitter that modulates neuroplasticity. Our primary aim was to assess whether the same a-tDCS paradigm alters local GABA concentration when applied to the healthy primary visual cortex. We also measured the effect of a-tDCS on visual cortex resting-state connectivity and sought to replicate reported observations of an association between visual cortex GABA concentration and the dynamics of binocular rivalry. Methods: Fourteen participants with normal vision completed two brain imaging sessions at least 48 hours apart. In each session, binocular rivalry dynamics, primary visual cortex GABA and glutamate-glutamine (Glx) concentrations (via magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)) and resting-state functional connectivity (via task-free fMRI) were measured at baseline. Real or sham a-tDCS (20 min, 2mA) was then applied to the visual cortex in a randomized sequence followed by a second set of MRS and fMRI measurements. Results: No between-session effects of a-tDCS on GABA or Glx concentration or resting-state functional connectivity were observed. A pre-planned within-session analysis revealed a significant increase in Glx following a-tDCS that did not withstand multiple comparisons correction. No consistent relationships between binocular rivalry dynamics and GABA concentration were apparent. Discussion: Together, our results suggest that a-tDCS effects on the visual cortex may differ from the GABA-associated mechanism in motor cortex.

Indexed as

binocular rivalryGABAGlxMRStDCS

Identifiers

PMID41169746
PMCPMC12570334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.