ArticleJournal of pediatric surgery case reports2025
Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery for staged repair of complex cloacal anomalies: A case series.
Article in Journal of pediatric surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) technique can be used during reconstruction for infants with complex congenital anomalies. In persistent cloacal malformations, this approach permits delineation of challenging anatomy and facilitates safer surgical separation of structures while minimizing tissue trauma for future procedures. Cases presentation: Three patients with persistent cloacal malformations and complex upper tract reproductive anatomy underwent the CELS technique during their series of reconstructive procedures. The average age at first stage reconstruction, that included anorectoplasty, was 14 months (range 9-22). The average follow-up length from the time of reconstruction was 6.5 years (range 4-9 years). All patients have since undergone colostomy takedown. Two patients have undergone delayed vaginal pull-through and/or introitoplasty, and one patient has not yet undergone vaginoplasty. Conclusion: The CELS technique may help reduce complications from open surgery, allows time for structural development, and minimizes tissue dissection and trauma at an early age. Staged repair for complex cloaca can be safely considered and allow for delay of vaginal reconstruction with minimal adverse short-term outcomes and impact on subsequent procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.