ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Emotionally adaptive support: a narrative review of affective computing for mental health.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroencephalography-Based Emotion Recognition Using Auditory Stimulation for Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond Performance: Cognitive Overload and Related Cognitive, Psychophysiological, and Performance States in Competitive Esports-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emotion Recognition from Facial Expressions Considering Individual Differences in Emotional Intelligence.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HAMAgent: human assisted multiagent system for emotion recognition and digital health-a survey and preliminary study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Immersive metaverse art as a psychological intervention for depression and anxiety: a narrative review and multilevel model integrating engagement, cultural identity, and neurocognitive mechanisms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Toward clinical integration of generative AI in mental health: personalization, multimodality and inter-entity experience.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have become increasingly prominent as scalable solutions to address global mental health needs. However, many existing tools lack the emotional sensitivity required to foster meaningful engagement and therapeutic effectiveness. Affective computing, a field focused on designing systems capable of detecting and responding to human emotions, offers promising advancements to the emotional responsiveness of these digital interventions. This narrative review examines how affective computing methods such as emotion recognition, sentiment analysis, emotion synthesis, and audiovisual and physiological signal processing, are being integrated into DMHIs to enhance user engagement and improve clinical outcomes. The findings suggest that emotionally adaptive systems can strengthen user engagement, simulate empathy, and support more personalized care. Early studies indicate potential benefits in terms of symptom reduction and user satisfaction, though clinical validation remains limited. Challenges such as algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and the need for ethical design frameworks continue to shape the development of this emerging field. By synthesizing current trends, technological advancements, and ethical considerations, this review highlights the potential of affective computing in digital mental health and identifies key directions for future research and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.