ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Dynamic optimization of stand structure in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proximal policy optimization integrated with Bayesian optimization for stand structure optimization inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Optimization of a Coupled Neuron Model Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Application of the Model in Bearing Fault Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dynamic optimization of stand structure inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rational structure of forest stands plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem functions, enhancing community stability, and ensuring sustainable management. Although progress has been made in stand structure optimization, most existing studies focus on static improvements and fail to adequately capture the dynamic nature of stand development. In addition, commonly used heuristic and traditional methods often suffer from limitations in computational efficiency and generalization ability. Methods: To address these challenges, this study explores the potential and advantages of multi-agent deep reinforcement learning in forest management, offering innovative insights and methods for achieving sustainable forest ecosystem management. Using the secondary forests of Results: The results indicate that multi agent deep reinforcement learning consistently outperformed multi agent reinforcement learning across all plots. For the initial objective function values of each plot (0.3501, 0.3799, 0.3982, 0.3344, 0.4294), the optimized results obtained through multi agent deep reinforcement learning (0.5378, 0.5861, 0.5860, 0.5130, 0.6034) were significantly superior to the maximum objective function values achieved by multi agent reinforcement learning (0.5302, 0.5369, 0.5766, 0.5014, 0.5906). Furthermore, the dynamic optimization results incorporating structure prediction demonstrate that all plots progressively approached an ideal stand condition over multiple optimization cycles (0.5718, 0.6101, 0.6455, 0.5863, 0.6210), leading to a more balanced stand structure and improved long-term stability. Discussion: This study proposes a novel stand structure optimization method that integrates multi agent deep reinforcement learning with structure prediction, providing theoretical support and practical guidance for the sustainable management of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.