Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169710›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Deconvolution and phylogeny inference of diverse variant types integrating bulk DNA-seq with single-cell RNA-seq.

Nishat Anjum Bristy, Russell Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nishat Anjum BristyRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Russell SchwartzRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-2252

Funding

Reconstructing mechanisms of somatic variation in diverse cellular lineagesR01HG010589 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, RUSSELL S · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Reconstructing clonal lineage trees ("tumor phylogenetics") has become a core tool of cancer genomics. Earlier approaches based on bulk DNA sequencing (DNA-seq) have largely given way to single-cell DNA-seq (scDNA-seq), which offers far greater resolution for clonal substructure. Available data has lagged behind computational theory, though. While single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) has become widely available, scDNA-seq remains costly and technically challenging, precluding routine use on large cohorts. This forces tradeoffs between the limited genome coverage of scRNA-seq, limited availability of scDNA-seq, and limited clonal resolution of bulk DNA-seq. These limitations are especially problematic for studying structural variations and focal copy number variations that are crucial to cancer progression but difficult to observe in RNA-seq. Results: We present TUSV-int, integrating bulk DNA-seq and scRNA-seq into a single deconvolution and phylogenetic inference framework while accommodating single nucleotide variants (SNV), copy number alterations (CNA), and structural variants (SV). Using integer linear programming (ILP), we deconvolve heterogeneous variant types and resolve them into a clonal lineage tree. We demonstrate improved deconvolution performance over methods lacking scRNA-seq or using more limited variant types. We further demonstrate its ability to better resolve clonal structure and mutational histories on a published DNA-seq/scRNA-seq breast cancer dataset.Source code is available at https://github.com/CMUSchwartzLab/TUSV-INT (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16884120). Availability and implementation: Source code is available at https://github.com/CMUSchwartzLab/TUSV-INT (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16884120).

Identifiers

PMID41169710
PMCPMC12571511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.