ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2025
A Deep Learning Approach Toward Differentiating Left versus Right for Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmia Originated from Outflow Tract.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is among the common cardiac diseases, ranging from benign conditions to those requiring immediate medical intervention. Many VAs originate from the heart's outflow tract (OT). However, this area's complexity and small size, along with other influencing external factors, pose significant challenges to accurate diagnosis. The similarity of the features of VAs on the electrocardiogram (ECG) originating from the right or left side of the OT may lead to misdiagnosis. This study aims to detect the site of origin for VAs originating from the OT, which is important as a key precognition for treatment during catheter ablation. Methods: We perform this diagnosis using the standard 12-lead ECG and deep learning (DL) techniques without additional equipment. First, inspired by next-generation sequencing in genetics, we created one-dimensional (1D) streams of premature beats from a public dataset of 334 patients. Then, to compare the performance of common 1D DL models, the data were presented to various models, including long short-term memory, gated recurrent unit, and 1D convolutional neural network (1D-CNN). Results: Experimental results show that the 1D-CNN network achieves the best performance, with an accuracy of 93.4% and an F1-score of 0.9313. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of DL in a higher level of applications, specifically in the treatment process, compared to conventional ECG analysis applications based on computerized methods. This represents a promising prospect for use in treatment processes without relying on complex and multifaceted diagnostic methods in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.