ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025
Delayed First Language Exposure Negatively Impacts Representation of Small Quantities: Evidence from Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most deaf and hard-of-hearing children are born to hearing parents, often delaying exposure to their first language. This negatively influences development of not only language, but also many other aspects of cognition, including exact representations of large quantities. The core knowledge view of numeracy predicts that delays in language exposure should not affect nonverbal representations of small quantities (1-3). This study is the first to investigate effects of language modality (spoken vs. signed) and timing of language experience (early, from birth vs. later) on the representation of small quantities of objects. We adapted the "Mr. Elephant" task (Shusterman et al., 2017) and examined whether children (age 3 to 7 years) succeeded on trials involving quantities 2 and 3. A logistic regression found that Timing and Socioeconomic Status significantly predicted Mr. Elephant performance, while Modality and Age did not. Early-exposed children were more likely to succeed on the task than Later-exposed children. For an exploratory follow-up, two measures of language were added into the analysis: Highest Count, which records children's recitation of the count list, and Give-a-Number ('Give-N'), which assesses children's understanding of the cardinal principle (CP). This logistic regression found that Timing and Give-N performance significantly and independently predicted Mr. Elephant performance, but Socioeconomic Status and Highest Count did not. Children who were CP-knowers were more likely to succeed on Mr. Elephant than non-CP-knowers. These results suggest that the representation of small quantity representations is associated with the timing of children's language exposure and their knowledge of the cardinal principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.