ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025
Can Large Language Models Generate Useful Linguistic Corpora?: A Case Study of the Word Frequency Effect in Young German Readers.
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subcategory vs category fluency: Items and networks in healthy young adults and simulation with a large language model.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Article
- Investigating lexical categorization in reading based on joint diagnostic and training approaches for language learners.NPJ science of learning · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linguistic corpora are an essential resource in psycholinguistic research. Here, we generate new corpora using large language models (LLMs) and determine their usefulness for estimating the word frequency effect on reading performance, focusing on German children. We prompted three different LLMs to create corpora of children's stories using the titles of 500 books, mimicking an existing corpus of children's books (childLex). In Experiment 1, we found that word frequency correlated strongly between childLex and the LLM corpora, despite a lower lexical richness of LLM text. Compared to childLex, we found that the estimated effect size of the LLM-based word frequency effect was lower, but that it explained more variance in reading performance (using reaction times for about 1000 words in a lexical decision task). In Experiment 2, we found that prompting for children-directed text results in word frequency that better fits to child compared to adult reading times, and also that increasing temperature can increase lexical richness. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1 using two open-weight LLMs. Across all 10 corpora (out of which 9 were LLM-based), we found that corpora with lower lexical richness generally fit better to reaction times. We discuss the potential of this approach, considering the risks associated with utilizing highly complex large language models (LLMs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.