Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169687›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025

Can Large Language Models Generate Useful Linguistic Corpora?: A Case Study of the Word Frequency Effect in Young German Readers.

Job Schepens, Hanna Woloszyn, Nicole Marx, Benjamin Gagl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Job SchepensInstitute for Digital Humanities, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hanna WoloszynSelf learning systems Lab, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nicole MarxMercator Institute, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-0618
Benjamin GaglSelf learning systems Lab, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2339-6293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linguistic corpora are an essential resource in psycholinguistic research. Here, we generate new corpora using large language models (LLMs) and determine their usefulness for estimating the word frequency effect on reading performance, focusing on German children. We prompted three different LLMs to create corpora of children's stories using the titles of 500 books, mimicking an existing corpus of children's books (childLex). In Experiment 1, we found that word frequency correlated strongly between childLex and the LLM corpora, despite a lower lexical richness of LLM text. Compared to childLex, we found that the estimated effect size of the LLM-based word frequency effect was lower, but that it explained more variance in reading performance (using reaction times for about 1000 words in a lexical decision task). In Experiment 2, we found that prompting for children-directed text results in word frequency that better fits to child compared to adult reading times, and also that increasing temperature can increase lexical richness. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1 using two open-weight LLMs. Across all 10 corpora (out of which 9 were LLM-based), we found that corpora with lower lexical richness generally fit better to reaction times. We discuss the potential of this approach, considering the risks associated with utilizing highly complex large language models (LLMs).

Indexed as

large language modelslexical decision tasklinguistic corpusword frequency effect

Identifiers

PMID41169687
PMCPMC12571048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.