SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Prevalence of
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Canine infection with Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies published between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2024, were identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, with the final search completed on April 30, 2024. Two reviewers independently extracted data, resolving discrepancies through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Prevalence estimates were pooled using a random-effects model, heterogeneity was quantified, and subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore sources of variability. Results: Sixteen studies comprised of 4,974 dogs across five states were included, and the pooled prevalence of canine Chagas infection was 12% (95% CI: 0.07-0.21), with significant heterogeneity ( Conclusion: This review confirms the presence of canine
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.