Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Initial validation of the LSPain scale: a behaviour-based clinical tool for canine lumbosacral pain.

Roger Medina-Serra, Sandra Sanchis-Mora, Clara Conde Ruiz, Francesco Aprea, Eliseo Belda, Francisco G Laredo, Miguel Ángel Cabezas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roger Medina-SerraAnaesthesia and Pain Management, North Downs Specialist Referrals, Part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Bletchingley, United Kingdom.
Sandra Sanchis-MoraBlaise Veterinary Referral Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Clara Conde RuizService d'anesthésie et algologie, CHV AniCura Armonia, Vaulx-Milieu, France.
Francesco ApreaHospital Veterinari Canis Mallorca, Mallorca, Spain.
Eliseo BeldaDepartamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco G LaredoDepartamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Miguel Ángel CabezasDepartamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to validate the LSPain Scale, a novel 4-point ordinal instrument for assessing lumbosacral pain in dogs based on behavioural responses to palpation of the lumbosacral region. Methods: A preliminary analysis was conducted using clinical data to inform sample size estimation and to explore the scale's convergent validity and responsiveness. Subsequently, a prospective validation was performed using 50 anonymised clinical videos retrospectively collected from client-owned dogs evaluated for suspected lumbosacral pain. Dogs represented a broad clinical spectrum and were graded using the LSPain Scale, where scores range from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). Trained observers, including pain specialists and general practitioners, independently scored the videos while blinded to clinical data. Results: Psychometric evaluation demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity, responsiveness to treatment, inter- and intra-rater reliability, and usability across experience levels. Discussion: The findings support the LSPain Scale as a valid and reliable clinician-based tool for standardised assessment and monitoring of lumbosacral pain in dogs.

Indexed as

canine degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (CDLSS)doglumbosacral painpain assessmentpain scale

Identifiers

PMID41169681
PMCPMC12570342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.