ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Developing person-centred care in hospices through the voice and leadership of nursing: lessons from the United Kingdom.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing leadership and the voice of nurses are crucial for developing person-centred care in hospices. Concerns have been raised that, as palliative care has evolved from its original vision and become more integrated into the mainstream healthcare system, it has increasingly become medicalised. This paper presents an emancipatory practice development programme aimed at enhancing the visibility and voice of nursing and nurse leadership to improve person-centred care in hospices across the United Kingdom. Methods: The project was a 10-month collaborative education programme for nursing practice leaders in hospices throughout the United Kingdom, running from September 2023 to July 2024. A total of 24 clinical and practice development leaders from eight different hospices participated. The Kirkpatrick model for evaluating learning programmes was adapted to create a framework for assessing the programme's outcomes and impact. The evaluation process utilised Collaborative Critical Creative Inquiry. Results: The key findings from the evaluation indicate that the programme created conditions for the participants to gain transformative insights and understanding that positively impacted their practice through emancipatory practice development. Discussion: The programme enabled leaders of person-centred care in hospices to rekindle their vision for palliative care practice. The participants became more aware of how care was constructed within their organisations and recognised the assumptions that were often taken for granted-assumptions that influenced daily care practices that sometimes leaned towards a traditional medical model. They acquired new skills and knowledge that empowered them to engage more intentionally in making changes to enhance person-centred care. Conclusion and implications for practice: Humanising healthcare is a global agenda, and within hospice care, nurses are at the heart of transforming care to be more person-centred. They are well-positioned to reclaim the core principles of palliative care, as developed by Cicely Saunders, and push back against the medical model that has overshadowed the development and integration of palliative care into current healthcare systems. Nurses are expert practitioners and leaders who hold positions of authority within their organisations. Yet, for many, their change-making potential is not realised. Innovative learning and development programmes are an essential part of humanising healthcare, and emancipatory practice development programmes can unlock nurses' potential to lead this transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.