ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2025
Quality assessment of "naturally occurring" high-percentage L-dopa commercial products proposed as dietary supplements on the Internet: from labeling to analytical findings.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Levodopa (L-dihydroxyphenylalanine or L-dopa) is a precursor of the neurotransmitter dopamine and is used in Parkinson's disease therapy. L-dopa dietary supplements are widely marketed as brain support. Among the L-dopa products claiming to contain botanical extracts, those from Methods: Four L-dopa products marketed as dietary supplements were purchased online and analyzed for labeling accuracy. The identification of L-dopa and the detection of undeclared pharmaceutical or nootropic ingredients were carried out via mass spectrometry (LC-MS Q-TOF). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to confirm the presence of L-dopa and quantify it. Furthermore, a Google Trends analysis was conducted to study interest in the terms "levodopa" and "brain supplements" and their Italian equivalents, over the last 10 years in Italy and globally. Results: Visual inspection of labeling revealed that the extract of Discussion: The obtained results showed evidence of potential risks related to consuming dietary supplements purchased online containing high-dose L-dopa. These risks arise from the inclusion of unauthorized botanical extracts, unclear labeling, and inconsistencies between labeled and actual dosages. Given the observed increasing public interest in levodopa, these findings highlight the need to control this market and inform consumers and physicians about the risks of purchasing unauthorized online products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.