ArticleMolecular syndromology2025
High Diagnostic Yield of Next-Generation Sequencing in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients and a Novel Variant in the
Article in Molecular syndromology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) is a disorder that encompasses a group of hereditary neuropathies. The clinical features of CMT is variable due to genetic heterogeneity. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in the molecular diagnosis of CMT in routine clinical practice and to determine the causative genetic variants. Methods: NGS was used to detect the causative single nucleotide variants in 55 genes associated with CMT alongside multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) for copy number variation (CNV) analysis of the Results: A total of 58 patients with suspected CMT were analyzed. MLPA was performed on 54 patients, while 4 underwent direct NGS due to suspicion of other CMT types. MLPA revealed pathogenic CNVs in 21 patients (36.2%). Among the 33 patients with negative MLPA results, 24 underwent NGS. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 17 (60.7%) of total 28 patients. Overall, the diagnostic yield was 65.5% (38/58). Moreover, a novel likely pathogenic variant (c.637C>T) was detected in the Conclusion: Targeted NGS panels are a highly effective tool for the genetic diagnosis of CMT and increase the diagnostic rates when used in conjunction with MLPA. Molecular genetic diagnosis is critical for CMT patients, particularly in light of ongoing research into targeted therapies. Furthermore, presence of undiagnosed cases underscores the likelihood that additional causative genes and mechanisms in CMT etiology remain to be discovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.