ArticleLearning health systems2025
Learning Health System study designs for the evaluation of workforce interventions to cultivate eudaimonia (flourishing).
Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning Health System study designs for the evaluation of workforce interventions to cultivate eudaimonia (flourishing).Learning health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Learning Health System (LHS) framework is designed to enhance healthcare by systematically integrating internal data and external evidence to promote quality, safety, and efficiency, aligning science, informatics, incentives, and culture for continuous improvement, innovation, and equity. Methods: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) also outlined key LHS learning goals structured around four interconnected approaches: (1) evidence generation to create new knowledge, (2) evidence adoption to translate findings into practice, (3) evidence dissemination to share best practices across systems, and (4) evidence management to integrate internal and external insights using technology and informatics. We propose this model can also enhance workforce well-being (also termed "flourishing" or Findings: Healthcare workers who Contribution: Together, the application of the AHRQ learning goals forms a continuous feedback loop that facilitates mutual enhancement between healthcare delivery and research, advancing clinician well-being and system-wide improvement. This change in focus offers a new method for the design and evaluation of workforce well-being interventions, can restore excellence in patient care, and contributes to creating sustainable, human-centered healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.