ArticleLearning health systems2025
Developing a data visualization tool for adults with disorders of consciousness: Qualitative analysis of user perspectives.
Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a data visualization tool for adults with disorders of consciousness: Qualitative analysis of user perspectives.Learning health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: We report on the process of using a learning health systems (LHS) approach to design a data visualization dashboard to monitor the rehabilitation progress of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe brain injury. Methods: Our team conducted a qualitative study using informational interviews with key informants to understand informational needs and priorities for the dashboard from the perspectives of rehabilitation therapists, family members of patients with DoC, and third-party payors. We used a thematic survey approach to organize the findings with the following categories: (a) how the dashboard will be used; (b) content to be displayed; (c) organization and design of content; and (d) technical requirements. We used an iterative process to develop the dashboard, with multiple opportunities for stakeholder feedback. Results: Seven people participated in informational interviews ( Conclusions: In the unique case of patients with DoC, who cannot speak for themselves, effective communication among rehabilitation clinicians, family members or care partners, and third-party payors is highly important for optimal care. The key benefit of using an LHS approach is positioning the team to proactively design the dashboard to account for the needs and preferences of different end users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.