ReviewCureus2025
Vasomotor Rhinitis: Current Concepts and Emerging Therapies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local immune and inflammatory endotypes of the nasal mucosa in allergic and non-allergic chronic rhinitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) is a non-infectious, non-allergic subtype of rhinitis, which is characterized by nasal blockage, liquid runny rhinorrhea, and increased sensitivity to nonspecific nasal triggers (such as changing temperature and smell). Although VMR is a disease with a high prevalence rate, it is wrongly diagnosed and under-treated due to its clinical manifestation with allergic rhinitis. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to obtain articles published between 2000 and 2025. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and major clinical guidelines were included, while case reports and non-English studies were excluded to ensure consistency and reproducibility of the findings. Existing evidence shows that multiple regulations of the autonomic nervous system, neuropathway neuroplasticity and inflammation, and excessive quantitative stimulation of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels all play a role in the pathophysiology of VMR. Variable therapies include corticosteroids, intranasal antihistamines, and anticholinergics, although ipratropium bromide has had the best dependability results in terms of rhinorrhea. Surgical procedures that may be considered include intranasal capsaicin, botulinum toxin injections, ablation of the posterior nasal nerve (radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy), and vidian neurectomy, but these interventions are not yet conclusively demonstrated or established as promising to help the patient with refractory symptoms. VMR is a condition that has not been adequately studied but is common and requires a progressive management style that relies on triggers. Whereas conventional intranasal treatment is the most appropriate in the first case, nerve-specific treatment has promising outcomes in the case of relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.