ArticleJACS Au2025
HU Searches and Binds Specific DNA via a Multistep Process Combining Weak Electrostatic Binding, Protein Reorientation, and DNA Flexibility.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their limited resolution, coarse-grained simulations have been the chosen method to obtain mechanistic information regarding the process of protein binding to DNA. Here, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art atomic simulations can capture binding events and provide new molecular insight. By using the bacterial model protein HU, we link existing crystal structures to the search and recognition states. We find that weak contacts mediated by only a few positively charged residues enable initial binding, followed by facilitated diffusion and transient rolling on DNA. Extended arms in the HU structure serve as antennae to search for DNA, permitting intrasegmental hops and intersegmental jumps. The transition to specific binding only occurs at the DNA target site, helped by its bendability, indicating a "concerted" binding mechanism between the protein and DNA. We observe a lack of direct binding to the most positively charged area, which is hidden behind HU's arms and defines the recognition state. This prevents the protein from being trapped in random DNA. Instead, the multistep binding process found here ensures that the high-affinity complex only occurs at the target position. We anticipate that other DNA-binding proteins with multiple surface-charged regions and DNA-bend induction capability might follow a similar strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.