ArticleJACS Au2025
Synthesis of
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal editing of 5-membered carbocycles to 6-membered heteroaromatic compounds represents an attractive concept that would enable late-stage heteroarene construction. However, the current state of the art does not offer many synthetic strategies on how to achieve such a goal. One of those is based on a reaction of aromatic tertiary alcohols with sodium azide under acidic conditions, i.e., the Schmidt reaction. Herein, we present a hitherto unexplored double Schmidt reaction toward aromatic compounds possessing two pyridine rings. It is the first example of a conversion of 5,8-disubstituted indeno-[2,1-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.