ArticleJACS Au2025
Molecular Design Principles for Achieving High-Efficiency Light-Induced Charge Separation at the Nanometer Scale.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Molecular Trimming Strategy for Hypoxia-Tolerant Photosensitizers With Enhanced cGAS-STING Activation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The light-induced separation of charges, fundamental to natural photosynthesis, is key to converting solar energy into chemical energy in artificial systems. One challenge is that charges tend to spontaneously recombine in a downhill, energy-wasting process. This recombination can be slowed by increasing the distance between charges, but doing so also reduces the efficiency of the initial charge-separating step. We investigated how the quantum efficiency of energy-storing charge separation and the rate of energy-wasting charge recombination vary over distances from 22 to 44 Å in three structurally well-defined molecular donor-photosensitizer-acceptor compounds. Our key finding is that separation efficiency can remain high, around 60%, even at distances of up to 44 Å when redox relays are used instead of passive molecular bridges. At the same time, undesirable charge recombination remains slow, occurring on a time scale approaching the low-millisecond range. These results support the widely accepted view that multistep hopping is more effective than single-step electron tunneling. However, while previous studies have strongly focused on kinetics and charge-transfer rates, the question of how the efficiency of light-induced charge separation in donor-photosensitizer-acceptor systems is affected by the transition from tunneling to hopping remains underexplored. The newly gained insight from focusing on quantum efficiencies rather than charge-separation rates is critically important, as light-independent charge recombination events often go undetected when only rates of light-induced steps are in focus. Overall, our findings provide valuable design principles for creating artificial photosynthetic systems with high light-to-chemical energy conversion efficiency, offering important insights for the broader fields of solar energy conversion and artificial photosynthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.