ArticleiScience2025
Low-hysteresis highly reversible topological magnetized elastomer for robotic tactile.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Physical Contact: Non-Contact Flexible Sensors With Intelligent Perception.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Hybrid Decision-Making Management for Material Selection in the Design of Wearable Pressure-Sensing Orthoses in Neurorehabilitation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magneto-X Effects in Magnetic Soft Materials and Their Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elastomers are essential for flexible tactile sensors but suffer from mechanical hysteresis and energy dissipation, limiting robotic sensing stability. We developed a low-hysteresis magnetic elastomer using a topologically magnetized network and 3D-printed rhombic dodecahedron structure, exploiting magnetic repulsion for enhanced performance. The material achieves 0.1 MPa modulus, 0.12 energy loss coefficient (70% strain), and 98% reversibility as a force-to-magnetic conversion medium. The resulting sensor exhibits 1.18% hysteresis (0-115 kPa), minimal energy loss, and superior reversibility compared to conventional elastomers. Integrated into robotic hands, it enables stable static gripping (5+ h) and maintains signal accuracy after 30,000+ dynamic cycles. This work provides a high-performance elastomer design for durable and precise robotic tactile perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.