ArticleiScience2025
Spatial artifact detection improves the reproducibility of drug screening experiments.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and reproducible drug screening experiments are essential for drug discovery and personalized medicine. We demonstrate how systematic experimental errors in drug plates negatively impact data reproducibility, and that conventional quality control (QC) methods based on plate controls fail to detect these spatial errors. To address this limitation, we developed a control-independent QC approach that uses normalized residual fit error (NRFE) to identify systematic artifacts in drug screening experiments. Analysis of >100,000 duplicate measurements from the PRISM pharmacogenomic study revealed that NRFE-flagged experiments show 3-fold lower reproducibility among technical replicates. By integrating NRFE with QC methods to analyze 41,762 matched drug-cell line pairs between two datasets from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer project, we improved the cross-dataset correlation from 0.66 to 0.76. Available as an R package at https://github.com/IanevskiAleksandr/plateQC, plateQC provides a robust toolset for enhancing drug screening data reliability and consistency for basic research and translational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.