Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169447›Full record

ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2025

Shell-Thickness-Modulated Charge Carrier Transfer in Au Nanocube@CdS Core-Shell Nanostructures for Plasmon-Driven Photocatalysis.

Qin Zhang, Chen Zhang, Yanan Deng, Huijuan Cao, Cailin Liang, Jie Yang, Jiayao Zhutang, Lin Wei, Lehui Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qin ZhangKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Petrochemical Materials and Fine Utilization of Resources, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Chen ZhangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Yanan DengCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Huijuan CaoKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Petrochemical Materials and Fine Utilization of Resources, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Cailin LiangKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Petrochemical Materials and Fine Utilization of Resources, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Jie YangKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Petrochemical Materials and Fine Utilization of Resources, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Jiayao ZhutangKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Petrochemical Materials and Fine Utilization of Resources, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Lin WeiKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Petrochemical Materials and Fine Utilization of Resources, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-914X
Lehui XiaoCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-2342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of highly efficient photocatalysts for the utilization of solar energy has been extensively explored in the past few decades. Due to the strong light-matter interaction in plasmonic nanostructures, the combination of plasmonic nanomaterials with other poor light-absorbing catalytic materials presents a promising strategy for expanding the scope of light-driven heterogeneous catalysis. Although the photocatalytic performance of these hybridized structures has been greatly improved, how to regulate the charge carrier transfer efficiency in these heterostructures is still ambiguous. In this work, we prepared a metal-semiconductor core-shell heterostructure through precisely coating a thin layer of CdS onto the gold nanocube (AuNC) surface. A noticeable increase in photoelectrical response from the core-shell structure relative to either AuNCs or pure CdS nanoparticles can be observed in photocurrent generation efficiency, electron lifetime, and charge separation efficiency. More importantly, the photoelectrical responses can be well regulated by changing the semiconductor shell thickness on the nanocube surface. An optimum shell thickness for the light-driven photocatalytic reaction is around 8.3 nm, which exhibits the highest charge carrier transfer efficiency and hot-electron generation rate.

Indexed as

charge carrierscore−shell nanoparticlesphotocatalysisplasmonicssemiconductor

Identifiers

PMID41169447
PMCPMC12569953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.