Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169442›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2025

The Role of METS-IR in Early Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Women: A Two-Center Prospective Study.

Junxiang Gao, Shuoning Song, Yanbei Duo, Shihan Wang, Xiaolin Qiao, Yuemei Zhang, Jiyu Xu, Jing Zhang, Xiaorui Nie, Qiujin Sun and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Junxiang GaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-2903-9710
Shuoning SongDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-4063
Yanbei DuoDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shihan WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6854-9217
Xiaolin QiaoDepartment of Obstetrics, Beijing Chaoyang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuemei ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics, Haidian District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jiyu XuCore Facility of Instrument, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Laboratory, Haidian District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaorui NieDepartment of Obstetrics, Beijing Chaoyang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qiujin SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xianchun YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ailing WangNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wei SunCore Facility of Instrument, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yong FuDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mengmeng ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yingyue DongDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zechun LuNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tao Yuan *Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weigang Zhao *Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This two-center prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR) for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Chinese women during early pregnancy and compare its performance with conventional insulin resistance (IR) indices. Methods: This prospective investigation evaluated 1450 Chinese gravidas (<12 gestational weeks) without pregestational diabetes from two obstetrical institutions. Baseline clinical-biochemical profiling occurred during the first trimester (6-12 weeks), with GDM confirmation via standardized 75g oral glucose tolerance testing at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Analytical methodologies incorporated multivariable regression modeling and ROC curve optimization to quantify the predictive validity of five metabolic indices (METS-IR, TyG index, TG/HDL-C ratio, HOMA-IR, TyG-BMI) for GDM risk stratification. Results: Among participants, 378 (26.1%) developed GDM. The GDM group (n=378, 26.1%) was older (median age 31.0 vs 30.0 years, p<0.0001) and had higher prepregnancy BMI (22.62 vs 21.32 kg/m², p<0.0001), fasting glucose (4.7 vs 4.5 mmol/L, p<0.0001) compared to NGT. The GDM group exhibited significantly higher METS-IR (31.14 vs 29.03, p <0.001) and other IR indices (p <0.001). In unadjusted models, METS-IR quartile 4 (Q4) was strongly associated with GDM (OR=3.33, 95% CI:2.38-4.70), but this association attenuated after adjusting for age, weight gain, lipids, and insulin (adjusted OR=1.56, 95% CI:1.04-2.35). Comparatively, the TyG index (adjusted OR=3.06, 95% CI:2.03-4.66) and TG/HDL-C ratio (adjusted OR=2.02, 95% CI:1.38-2.99) retained robust predictive power. ROC analysis revealed a moderate discriminative capacity for METS-IR (AUC=0.629 unadjusted; 0.676 fully adjusted), outperformed by HOMA-IR (AUC=0.699) and TyG (AUC=0.699). METS-IR demonstrated high specificity (76.2%) in unadjusted screening but showed dependency on metabolic confounders in adjusted models. Conclusion: METS-IR shows promise for early GDM screening and is outperformed by TyG and HOMA-IR in predictive value. METS-IR in early pregnancy reflects metabolic dysregulation linked to GDM risk, yet its predictive utility is partially mediated by lipid and insulin abnormalities. While METS-IR offers clinical feasibility through routine measurements, TyG and HOMA-IR exhibit superior independent predictive value. These findings highlight the importance of context-specific IR indices for early GDM risk stratification and underscore METS-IR's role as a composite marker of metabolically unhealthy obesity in pregnancy.

Indexed as

early pregnancygestational diabetes mellitusinsulin resistanceMETS-IRpredictorsprospective cohort

Identifiers

PMID41169442
PMCPMC12570983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.