ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Research progress of rebound pain after nerve block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analgesic and Hemodynamic Effects of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block in Radius Fracture Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- A longitudinal qualitative study on decision-making and rehabilitation behavior in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Rebound pain following peripheral nerve block in extremity fracture surgery: pathophysiological mechanisms based on the "Triple-Hit" model and multimodal preventive strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is a commonly performed surgical intervention for rotator cuff injuries. The advent of ultrasound guidance has facilitated the widespread adoption of nerve blocks as an adjunct anesthetic and analgesic strategy in the perioperative phase of ARCR, offering notable benefits in maintaining patients' intraoperative hemodynamic stability and reducing opioid consumption. Despite the minimally invasive nature of ARCR, a subset of patients still experiences substantial pain, encompassing both acute pain and rebound pain following nerve block. Post-nerve block rebound pain is characterized by severe and disabling discomfort, which adversely impacts the patient experience and postoperative recovery. The mechanism underlying rebound pain after nerve block may involve aberrant excitation of relevant nerve fibers, the pharmacology of local anesthetics, nerve injury, local inflammatory factors, surgical anesthesia, and patient-specific variability. The review suggests that the incidence of post-nerve block rebound pain can be reduced, and postoperative pain management outcomes following ARCR can be improved, through interventions such as continuous nerve block, combined peripheral nerve block, administration of local anesthetic adjuvants, multimodal analgesia, and patient education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.