ArticleJTCVS open2025
Impact of segmentectomy on treatment for secondary malignancies and other causes of death after lung cancer surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marginal benefit of segmentectomy over lobectomy in minimally invasive surgery for stage IA lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical research advances in thoracic surgery and thoracic oncology in 2025: a panoramic narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Deaths not associated with primary lung cancer (other deaths) and secondary malignancies affect long-term survival after surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The JCOG0802 trial suggested that segmentectomy may lower the risk of such deaths. This study examined the relationship between the incidence of other deaths and surgical procedures. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with clinical stage 0 or IA non-small cell lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy between 2013 and 2016. Other deaths were defined as deaths from causes unrelated to the original lung cancer. Guideline-concordant treatment was assessed based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. Results: The 5-year overall survival was 90.7%, with a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Among 122 total deaths, 51 (41.8%) were other deaths. Segmentectomy (n = 241) was associated with a lower rate of other deaths (2.5% vs 5.9%) than lobectomy (n = 758), including deaths from other malignancies (1.2% vs 2.6%) and nonmalignancy-related deaths (1.2% vs 3.3%). These findings remained consistent after adjusting for patient characteristic imbalances between the groups. Further, the rate of guideline-concordant treatment for secondary malignancies was higher in the segmentectomy group than in the lobectomy group (71.4% vs 63.8%), with a 9.8% higher rate for second primary lung cancer. Conclusions: Segmentectomy was associated with a lower incidence of deaths not associated with primary lung cancer than lobectomy. The higher rate of guideline-concordant treatment for secondary malignancies in the segmentectomy group may partially explain the reduced incidence of deaths from secondary malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.