ArticleJTCVS open2025
Impact of the discrepancy between predicted and actual ring size on the outcomes of mitral valve repair using the loop technique.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of the discrepancy between the predicted annuloplasty ring size determined by preoperative transesophageal echocardiography and the actual ring size on the outcomes of mitral valve repair (MVr) using primarily the loop technique. Methods: Among 370 patients who underwent MVr between January 2008 and December 2024, 154 who underwent MVr with the semirigid ring for degenerative disease were involved in this study. Ring size was estimated according to the lengths of A2 and P2 by transesophageal echocardiography. Patients were classified into 3 groups-small, match, and large-based on the discrepancy between the predicted and actual ring sizes. Results: Compared with the other small and match groups, patients in the large group had shorter anterior leaflet length ( Conclusions: Size mismatch of the prosthesis ring did not change the coaptation length, late MR recurrence, or functional mitral stenosis after MVr.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.