ArticleJTCVS open2025
Safety of ultra-permissive anemia within a cardiac surgery patient blood management program.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Structured Preoperative Anemia Management in Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Patient Blood Management Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: There remains a lack of studies assessing the safety of highly restrictive patient blood management in cardiac surgery. Our patient blood management program has been focused on ultra-permissive anemia, tolerating hemoglobin concentrations 6.0 g/dL or more in nonbleeding patients. We reviewed our results following an ultra-permissive anemia strategy regarding blood transfusion rates and the association with major complications after cardiac surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting managed with ultra-permissive anemia were compared with historical controls, labeled the pre-ultra-permissive anemia group, who were transfused at the discretion of the clinician. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed, and the groups were compared for blood transfusion rates, major complications, length of stay, and cost. Results: A total of 1216 patients were analyzed. Patients in the ultra-permissive anemia group received significantly less packed red blood cells and other blood components. The mean intraoperative and postoperative packed red blood cells transfusion rates were significantly lower in the ultra-permissive anemia cohort, 2% and 12% versus 27% and 29% pre-ultra-permissive anemia ( Conclusions: Our data suggest that ultra-permissive anemia, tolerating hemoglobin values as low as 6 g/dL, is safe and significantly reduces overall blood use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.