ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Trees in the Eyes of Young Learners: A Study on Knowledge and Educational Methods.
Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trees in the Eyes of Young Learners: A Study on Knowledge and Educational Methods.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children often exhibit limited knowledge of plant life, a phenomenon referred to as "plant awareness disparity," which can hinder the development of environmental literacy and ecological stewardship. Despite the foundational role of plants in ecosystems, educational systems and cultural narratives frequently prioritize animals, leaving children's understanding of trees underdeveloped. This study aimed to examine how primary school children in the rural Slovak village of Granč-Petrovce acquire knowledge about trees, and how formal education, family practices, and peer interactions shape this learning. Using an interdisciplinary approach grounded in ethnobiology and social anthropology, the research combined participant observation, free listing, map drawing, semi-structured interviews, diaries, and outdoor walks with 10 children aged 7-9 over a five-week period. Results revealed that children were most familiar with fruit trees such as apple and cherry, with knowledge strongly tied to personal, hands-on experiences in gardens and during family activities. While formal education introduced certain species, these were less salient unless reinforced through lived interaction. Peer learning also played a notable role, with older children often teaching younger peers about plants. Despite spending time outdoors, children who lacked active engagement with plants showed limited ecological understanding, particularly in areas like tree reproduction. The study underscores that the quality of engagement with nature-especially when culturally and relationally meaningful-matters more than the quantity of exposure. These findings advocate for educational strategies that integrate outdoor, experiential, and peer-based learning to foster deeper plant knowledge and reduce plant awareness disparity among young learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.