ArticleNeural regeneration research2026
Interspecies differences in the expression of cannabinoid receptors at the tissue and cellular levels.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal deprivation and adolescent alcohol exposure induce sex-dependent alterations in stress-related behavior and lipid signaling in rats.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Review
- Radical Revelations: The Interplay of Nitrosative Stress, the Endocannabinoid System, and Treatment of Age-Related Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the cellular and molecular distribution of cannabinoids can address a highly contentious perspective in the pain neuroscience field: whether cannabinoids are viable in pain relief. Due to insufficient evidence for cannabinoids in reducing pain in clinical trials and gaps in knowledge across the translational research process, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) published a position statement in 2021 recommending against the general use of cannabinoids to treat pain. A possible mechanistic reason for the lack of translatability is interspecies differences in the expression of the cannabinoid type 1 and type 2 receptors at the tissue and cellular levels. Additionally, the anatomical site that is most important for analgesia has been elusive. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of the anatomical distribution of cannabinoid receptors throughout the nervous system across species. We traverse historical and contemporary literature to illustrate the progression of methodology and perspectives. We discuss co-localized markers on cannabinoid receptor-expressing cells to elucidate possible anatomically dependent roles of the endocannabinoid system. We also discuss differences in cannabinoid receptor expression across species that may contribute to challenges in translatability between rodents and humans. Lastly, we cover how various types of pain can differentially alter the expression of cannabinoid receptors and how this may impact cannabinoid-based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.