Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169212›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2026

Repairing spinal cord injuries: The most promising polymeric biomaterials and local drug delivery.

Inês Martins, Cláudia Nunes, Diogo Trigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inês MartinsCICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Cláudia NunesCICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Diogo TrigoiBiMED-Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4432-0925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury results in severe sensory and motor deficits, with a dramatic impact on lifespan and healthspan, due to the limited regenerative capacity of the central nervous system. Following the initial injury, glial scarring and extracellular matrix barriers prevent axonal regeneration, while secondary damage exacerbates inflammation and tissue loss. The gold standard treatment in the last decades is acute surgery and systemic drug administration. New technologies have been developed, such as stem cell therapies, or the combinatory use of biomaterials, nonetheless still offering limited recovery. Successful therapies must act directly on neurons, activating regenerative pathways, while simultaneously promoting a pro-regenerative environment. However, polymeric materials have, in recent years, shown a regenerative potential through a series of different processes, from promoting neural regeneration by supporting tissue repair and reducing inflammation, to local drug delivery mechanisms. In this work, we systematize the state-of-the-art, exploring recent advancements in polymer-based therapies for spinal cord injury, discussing their characteristics, limitations, and promising future applications.

Indexed as

drug deliverypolymersrecoveryregenerationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID41169212
PMCPMC13557670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.