ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
The impact of teachers' autonomy support on students' academic performance from the perspective of hyperscanning: the mediating role of autonomy need satisfaction.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research on self-determination theory has primarily focused on analyzing experiences and behaviors, without fully elucidating the neural basis of how teacher autonomy support influences students' academic performance. In this study, four individuals were selected to act as teachers, while 42 individuals were assigned as students. The study manipulated teacher autonomy support and control styles. By simulating the real teaching process, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning technology was used to examine how teachers' autonomy support style affected students' autonomous motivation, academic emotions, and test scores. The behavioral findings indicated that, in comparison to the teachers' control style, students exposed to the teacher autonomy support style demonstrated heightened autonomous motivation and more positive academic emotions. Furthermore, these positive effects were mediated by students' autonomy need satisfaction. The fNIRS results revealed that, compared to the teachers' control style, the students and teachers in the teachers' autonomy support style exhibited enhanced interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) in the left prefrontal cortex (lPFC). This INS was positively associated with autonomy need satisfaction and positive emotions, with consistent findings observed in dynamic teacher-student INS. These findings provide a basis for further exploration into the neural mechanism underlying autonomy need satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.