ArticleHip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy2026
Data resource profile: Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR).
Article in Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis and fragility fracture burden in Asia Pacific: Key findings from the APCO-IOF Asia Pacific Regional Audit.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2026Review
- Association of Preoperative Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks with Early Opioid Requirements and Pain in Older Adults with Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Local and regional anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) is a bi-national clinical quality registry established to enhance care and outcomes for older adults hospitalised with hip fractures. Since its inception in 2015, the ANZHFR has amassed data on over 120,000 hip fractures from 107 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. This ongoing data collection adheres to an internationally agreed-upon minimum common dataset and incorporates indicators aligned with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) Hip Fracture Clinical Care Standard. These indicators reflect best-practice guidelines for hip fracture care. The registry tracks key processes and outcomes, including care at presentation, preoperative pain management, orthogeriatric involvement, timing of surgery, postoperative mobilisation, prevention of subsequent fractures, hospital discharge transitions, functional outcomes, quality of life at 120 days, and post-injury mortality. This manuscript serves as a foundational reference for all future publications using ANZHFR data, providing detailed insights into its structure, scope, and significance. Researchers and collaborators interested in utilising or contributing to the ANZHFR data are encouraged to contact the team at clinical@anzhfr.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.