Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169093›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025

Engineering Processes for Plant-Based Meat Analogs: Current Status and Future Outlook.

Saqib Gulzar, Abdul Fateh Hosseini, Olga Martín-Belloso, Robert Soliva-Fortuny, Syed S H Rizvi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Engineering Processes for Plant-Based Meat Analogs: Current Status and Future Outlook.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saqib GulzarDepartment of Food Technology, Engineering and Science, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-9639
Abdul Fateh HosseiniDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-9555
Olga Martín-BellosoDepartment of Food Technology, Engineering and Science, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Robert Soliva-FortunyDepartment of Food Technology, Engineering and Science, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Syed S H RizviDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based meat analogs (PBMAs) have emerged as a promising alternative to conventional meat, driven by growing consumer interest in sustainability, ethical considerations, and health-conscious diets. However, despite initial market enthusiasm, PBMAs struggle with declining consumer acceptance due to their inability to fully replicate the texture, juiciness, and sensory experience of animal-derived meat. Key limitations include insufficient fibrous structure, reduced tenderness, poor moisture retention during cooking, inadequate lipid distribution mimicking marbling, and unsatisfactory mouthfeel. Addressing these challenges is critical for advancing PBMA development and securing long-term market success. Unlike most reviews that broadly examine PBMA, this review specifically explores the role of processing technologies and equipment designs in enhancing meat-like properties. In this review, we have analyzed the commonly used technique for creating PBMA, the high-moisture extrusion (HME), detailing its mechanisms, equipment configurations, and processing parameters. It also briefly covers some other techniques for creating fibrous structures. Furthermore, the critical interplay between equipment parameters, ingredient properties, and final product characteristics, considering factors such as die design, shear force, moisture content, temperature control, and gas incorporation, is also covered. Moreover, we highlight major technical challenges, including scalability, cost-effective production, molecular interactions during processing, and consumer-perceived authenticity. Finally, we propose future directions for refining processing techniques, innovating equipment designs, and overcoming commercialization barriers. By bridging existing knowledge gaps and offering practical insights, this comprehensive analysis aims to support researchers and industry professionals in advancing next-generation PBMA processing technologies for widespread industrial adoption to make more consumer-acceptable products.

Indexed as

Food HandlingMeatAnimalsHumansMeat Substitutesconsumer acceptanceextrusionfibrous textureplant‐based meat analogsplant proteins

Identifiers

PMID41169093
PMCPMC12576308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.