ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Daytime Performance in Insomnia Patients.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Daytime Performance in Insomnia Patients.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Preliminary evidence of the cognitive cost of insomnia: understanding adaptive decision-making during sleep deprivation.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients suffering from Nonorganic Insomnia (NI) are burdened by significant subjective daytime impairments which contribute to the reduction of quality of life for the patients and lead to greater healthcare utilization and increased indirect costs. Besides being central to diagnosis, operationalized criteria for daytime symptoms are lacking and data remain heterogeneous, especially regarding objectively measurable deficits. This study examines daytime performance in 329 NI patients through neuropsychological testing as well as self-report questionnaires, and correlates the results with polysomnographic data. In the main analysis, neuropsychological data, normalized for age and health status, displayed no impairment of vigilance or alertness-contrary to what is often assumed for NI and what would typically be expected in cases of sleepiness. For secondary analyses, neuropsychological data was then correlated with self-report and polysomnographic measures, and comparisons between NI patients with and without comorbidities were conducted. NI patients displayed a positive correlation of performance with nocturnal arousal markers, predominantly during REM sleep and a slightly diminished capability to increase focus in the phasic compared to tonic alertness paradigm. In summary, the current study in a well characterized large sample of NI patients with state-of-the-art measures of the most sensitive markers for sleep related daytime impairment found no evidence for diminished general vigilance or alertness due to sleep loss. The results help to understand conflicting evidence on neurocognitive deficits in insomnia by distinguishing between alertness or vigilance deficits and subtle changes in neurocognitive processing that might be better interpreted in line with underlying hyperarousal and anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.