Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168969›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2025

Pseudo-Observation Approach for Length-Biased Cox Proportional Hazards Model.

Mahboubeh Akbari, Najmeh Nakhaei Rad, Ding-Geng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pseudo-Observation Approach for Length-Biased Cox Proportional Hazards Model.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahboubeh AkbariDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0002-2378-1439
Najmeh Nakhaei RadDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ding-Geng ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa 150170South African DST-NRF-MRC SARChI Research Chair in Biostatistics 114613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudo-observations are used to estimate the expectation of a function of interest in a population when survival data are incomplete due to censoring or truncation. Length-biased sampling is a special case of a left-truncation model, in which the truncation variable follows a uniform distribution. This phenomenon is commonly encountered in various fields such as survival analysis and epidemiology, where the event of interest is related to the length or duration of an underlying process. In such settings, the probability of observing a data point is higher for longer lengths, leading to biased sampling. The goal of this paper is to apply pseudo-observations to estimate the regression coefficients in the Cox proportional hazards model under length-biased right-censored (LBRC) data. We assess the accuracy and efficiency of two approaches that differ in their generation of pseudo-observations, comparing them with two prominent standard methods in the presence of LBRC data. The results demonstrate that the two proposed pseudo-observation methods are comparable to the standard methods in terms of standard error, with advantages in providing confidence intervals that are closer to the nominal level in large sample sizes and specific scenarios. Additionally, although length-biased data are a special case of left-truncated data, they must be addressed separately by utilizing the information that the left-truncation variable follows a uniform distribution, as the simulation results show. We also establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of one of the proposed estimators. Finally, we applied the method to analyze a real dataset from LBRC.

Indexed as

BiometryBiasHumansProportional Hazards ModelsCox proportional hazards modelgeneralized estimation equationlength‐biased data‐observation

Identifiers

PMID41168969
PMCPMC12576048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.