ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2025
Pseudo-Observation Approach for Length-Biased Cox Proportional Hazards Model.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pseudo-Observation Approach for Length-Biased Cox Proportional Hazards Model.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pseudo-observations are used to estimate the expectation of a function of interest in a population when survival data are incomplete due to censoring or truncation. Length-biased sampling is a special case of a left-truncation model, in which the truncation variable follows a uniform distribution. This phenomenon is commonly encountered in various fields such as survival analysis and epidemiology, where the event of interest is related to the length or duration of an underlying process. In such settings, the probability of observing a data point is higher for longer lengths, leading to biased sampling. The goal of this paper is to apply pseudo-observations to estimate the regression coefficients in the Cox proportional hazards model under length-biased right-censored (LBRC) data. We assess the accuracy and efficiency of two approaches that differ in their generation of pseudo-observations, comparing them with two prominent standard methods in the presence of LBRC data. The results demonstrate that the two proposed pseudo-observation methods are comparable to the standard methods in terms of standard error, with advantages in providing confidence intervals that are closer to the nominal level in large sample sizes and specific scenarios. Additionally, although length-biased data are a special case of left-truncated data, they must be addressed separately by utilizing the information that the left-truncation variable follows a uniform distribution, as the simulation results show. We also establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of one of the proposed estimators. Finally, we applied the method to analyze a real dataset from LBRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.