ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Random-Order Ballistic Training Improves Throwing Distance in Resistance-Trained Males.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Random-Order Ballistic Training Improves Throwing Distance in Resistance-Trained Males.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The order of strength or ballistic exercises in complex training with similar movement patterns may affect performance outcomes. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether the order (random vs. progressive block) of ballistic exercise within a complex training protocol influences throwing performance and muscular strength in resistance-trained males. Twenty resistance-trained males (age: 21.1 ± 3.2 years; height: 177.1 ± 7.7 cm; and body mass: 76.6 ± 12.9 kg) with a minimum of 3 years of resistance training experience were randomly assigned to either a random-order, independent weight-order group (Rnd: e.g., 5,3, and 7 kg-7,3, and 5) or a blocked-order, progressive weights-order group (Blc: 3,5, and 7-3,5, and 7 kg) during medicine ball throwing. Subjects performed the training protocol three times per week for 4 weeks in addition to their normal training. Each training session included three repetitions of the bench press at 65% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM), followed by medicine ball throws for 10 sets. Both groups improved strength and throwing distance (p = 0.001). However, the Rnd group showed greater improvements (interaction effect) compared to the Blc group in 3 kg (p = 0.001; 52 VS. 115 cm) and 5 kg (p = 0.001; 32 VS. 95 cm), but not 7 kg throw distance (p = 0.10; 40 VS. 70 cm). These findings suggest that coaches and strength practitioners should consider performing ballistic exercises in random order rather than a progressive block ordering when designing complex training protocols as the unpredictable sequence appears to improve neuromuscular adaptations and translates more effectively to throwing performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.