ArticleBMC zoology2025
Trophic niche of invasive murid rodents in urban and peri-urban areas in South Africa: insights from stable isotope analysis.
Article in BMC zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are three invasive Rattus species (R. norvegicus, R. rattus, R. tanezumi) that are known to occur in South Africa. The three Rattus species are widespread in urban and peri-urban areas where they have had a significant impact on human health, infrastructure, and biodiversity. There is, however, limited information on their trophic ecology and on how factors that affect access to, and utilization of, food resources facilitate successful establishment. This study applied stable isotope analysis (SIA) to assess the trophic niches of the three Rattus species across selected urban and peri-urban landscapes in Gauteng Province. The three Rattus species occurred allopatrically: R. norvegicus in urban areas (Alexandra and Tembisa townships), R. rattus in the peri-urban University of Pretoria Experimental Farm, and R. tanezumi in peri-urban areas near Hammanskraal. Rattus tanezumi and R. rattus exploited broader food resources in peri-urban areas that are used for agricultural activities, while R. norvegicus had a more restricted niche in urban environments. Niche breadth expanded in summer, reflecting seasonal food availability, while sex- and age-related differences suggested subtle differences in feeding strategies, although the results were inconsistent across species and sites. Although some limitations, such as the fact that the three Rattus species were sampled in allopatry and missing baseline resources constrained interpretation, the study provides insights into how invasive rats adapt to different environments. Future research combining stable isotope analysis with long-term monitoring data will be essential to clarify niche partitioning and guide effective management of invasive rat populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.