ArticleImplementation science communications2025
Evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of dispatching EMS volunteers via "interconnected first-aid app" on the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: protocol for a type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness study.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) poses a critical public health challenge globally, with survival rates in China being significantly lower than that in high-income countries. Delayed emergency response, low bystander Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) rates, and limited AED accessibility contribute to poor outcomes. Leveraging smart technology to mobilize trained volunteers via mobile applications has emerged as a promising strategy to bridge these gaps. However, in urban contexts within China, there remains a scarcity of implementation evidence encompassing aspects such as adoption, contextual barriers, and sustainability. This shortage of evidence hinders the integration of policies and systems at the policy and system levels. This study aims to improve the survival rates of OHCA patients in China, by designing, implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of an optimized "Interconnected First-Aid App" dispatching EMS volunteers through a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted in 24 streets/townships across three districts in Shaoguan, China. The 24 streets/townships will be randomly assigned to four clusters, and each cluster will receive staggered interventions over 18 months, including volunteer recruitment/training, app-AED-EMS integration, and community education step by step. The trial adopts the PEDALS framework (Problem, Evidence-based Practice, Determinants, Action, Long-term, Scale) to assess both implementation processes and clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes include survival rates, bystander CPR/AED utilization, and response times. Implementation outcomes will evaluate adoption, feasibility, and sustainability through surveys, interviews, and health system data analysis. Findings will inform scalable, context-adapted implementation strategies for community-based OHCA response, particularly leveraging digital health innovations to address inequities in emergency care access in low- and middle-income settings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital (2025R0017-0001). Findings will be disseminated through traditional academic pathways, including peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with policy briefings prepared for stakeholders and leaders at the local, provincial and national levels.
trial registrationThe study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under the ID ChiCTR2500101187, registered on April 21, 2025.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.