ArticleGenome biology2025
Natural language processing of gene descriptions for overrepresentation analysis with GeneTEA.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An embedding-based framework enables statistical testing of gene-set function hypotheses inferred by large language models.Nature communications · 2026Article
- MetaScreener: a robust dual-mode framework for directional prioritization of actionable signatures through multi-dataset and multi-approach integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Natural language processing of gene descriptions for overrepresentation analysis with GeneTEA.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overrepresentation analysis is used to identify biological enrichment in a list of genes. Here, we introduce GeneTEA, a model that ingests free-text gene descriptions and incorporates natural language processing methods to learn a sparse gene-by-term embedding, which can be treated as a de novo gene set database. In benchmarks against existing overrepresentation analysis tools, only GeneTEA properly controls false discovery while consistently surfacing the most relevant biology, doing so with less redundancy. We show that the same approach can be applied to other organisms' genomes or compounds. Furthermore, we provide an interactive app and API for the trained GeneTEA model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.